Although the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announced in late 2010 that traffic deaths in the United States were at their lowest levels since 1950, nearly 34,000 individuals still lost their lives and 2.2 million individuals were injured in 2009 as a result of an auto accident. Assessing liability and determining fault in auto, motorcycle, and tractor-trailer accidents is imperative when a driver, passenger, other motorist, or pedestrian is injured or killed.
Early investigation is critically important to the successful resolution of an auto accident case. All too often, lawyers who claim to be experienced in representing auto accident victims do nothing during the crucial time immediately following an accident. They neglect to perform even the most rudimentary review. Our firm and our vast array of experts investigate each auto accident case immediately after being retained. We locate witnesses and obtain their statements. We locate and secure video surveillance of the accident and the respective vehicles as soon as possible, and retain an accident reconstructionist when necessary. We research how much insurance each of the respective vehicles has and whether there are any excess or umbrella policies available to afford additional coverage. We leave no stone unturned and vigorously protect the rights of our injured clients, ensuring they get the results they deserve and the compensation they are entitled to.
Hiring an experienced auto accident attorney is essential to the awarding of financial compensation. If a family member was killed or you or a family member has been injured in an auto accident, call 212-539-1800 today for a free, no obligation consultation.
Our specific experience includes the handling of:
Stavros E. Sitinas obtained a $2.8 million settlement during trial for a client who was involved in a three-car accident. The plaintiff was struck twice from behind in a rear-end collision involving two vehicles. The plaintiff sustained serious injuries to his neck, which resulted in nerve damage to both his arms as well as the middle finger on his left hand. The client also suffered from an aggravation of a preexisting, yet asymptomatic, degenerative condition in his neck that made him more susceptible to new injuries. Mr. Sitinas showed that, despite the extent of the plaintiff's preexisting degenerative spinal condition, the plaintiff lived a productive life, working full-time in a physically demanding occupation without any prior complaints of pain in his neck. Mr. Sitinas argued that while the plaintiff may have been more susceptible to a serious injury from an otherwise mild accident, the defendants were responsible for any medical conditions that developed after, and as a result of, the accident regardless of his increased susceptibility. The defendants agreed to settle shortly after the plaintiff's testimony and just prior to Mr. Sitinas putting forth his medical testimony.
Mr. Sitinas recently settled a case on behalf of a 54 year old passenger in a vehicle driven by his best friend. Another good friend of theirs was asleep in the back seat as the three of them were driving north on the Connecticut Turnpike (I-95).
Just after crossing into Connecticut from New York, the driver noticed his car was low on fuel. Knowing he did not have enough fuel to make it to Foxwoods Casino, the driver pulled into the right lane of this three-lane highway. He did so knowing there was a service area not far ahead on the highway.
At the same time, a box truck weighing several thousand pounds pulled up alongside their vehicle in the middle lane. When the front of the truck was parallel to the driver’s door of the much smaller sedan, the truck driver inexplicably cut into the right lane, striking the mid-section of the sedan and spinning it around, such that the entire driver’s side of the sedan was perpendicular to the front of the truck. Essentially, the truck was pushing the sedan up I-95 with the side of the car pasted to the front of the truck. The driver testified that as he looked out his side window, all he could see was the truck’s front grill against his window. At that point, the occupants of the vehicle feared for their lives. Worse yet, the truck’s driver had no idea he had just struck the sedan or that he was pushing the vehicle perpendicularly up the highway. He did, however, hear the impact and during his deposition testimony, he stated that upon hearing the impact, he believed his truck had suffered a tire blow-out, particularly because of the way his steering felt and because he could sense the truck was driving erratically. He blamed a blind-spot for not seeing the sedan, either before impact or while he was pushing the vehicle up the highway. This horrific situation continued for nearly a mile. The driver of the truck then attempted to pull off the highway and onto the right shoulder, however, there were concrete barriers set up and the truck actually ended up pushing our client’s vehicle up and onto the top of the concrete barriers. As a result of the impact with the barrier, the front passenger door was ejected open and our client’s foot actually came out of the car’s cabin only to be partially crushed when the door slammed closed on his foot.
With the car perilously perched on top of the concrete barrier, the occupants exited the vehicle and awaited Emergency Medical personnel.
As a result of this accident, our client suffered crush injuries to his right foot, a trabecular fracture in his medial malleolus, partial tears of the ligaments in his ankle, requiring arthroscopic surgery. He also developed pain in his back from months of using a cane and having an antalgic gait. When physical therapy did not cure his pain, he ultimately underwent a series of steroid injections for his lower back. When those failed, he finally made the difficult decision of undergoing a Transforaminal Lumbar Fusion Surgery at L5-S1.
Mr. Sitinas made a motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, which the court granted. This meant that the driver was found negligent as a matter of law and the case would proceed to trial solely on the issue of damages. Faced with the possibility of a jury awarding substantial damages at trial, the defendants asked Mr. Sitinas to attempt settlement of the matter via mediation.
Mr. Sitinas attended a mediation with one of New York’s most respected mediators, Mr. Kenneth Grundstein, and the case settled for nearly $1,000,000 (The actual settlement amount cannot be disclosed as it is part of a confidentiality agreement).
Stavros Sitinas obtained a $950,000 settlement on the eve of trial for a 38-year-old tractor-trailer driver whose truck was struck in the rear by another tractor-trailer on the Cross Bronx Expressway. As a result of the accident, the client suffered injuries to his lower back and neck, which required fusion surgery to correct. The client initially retained the services of a different attorney after his accident; however he dismissed that attorney because he felt the attorney was trying to settle his case for an amount that was insufficient relative to the injuries sustained. Within three months of commencing work on the case, Mr. Sitinas was able to secure a settlement offer that was $350,000 more than what his prior attorney was trying to convince him to accept. The $950,000 settlement was only $15,000 less than the maximum amount of insurance afforded to the offending tractor-trailer, an amount that surely would have been spent on expert testimony had the case gone to trial.
This case is a prime example of the importance of retaining an experienced trial lawyer from the outset, someone who is well known to the insurance companies and who has the skills and expertise to see your case through to the end. As this client learned, hiring the wrong attorney can directly impact the value of your case.